karl_lembke (karl_lembke) wrote,
karl_lembke
karl_lembke

Jason Van Steenwyk tears apart the first paragraph of Washington Post reporter Thomas Ricks' new book: Fiasco: America's Military Adventure in Iraq.
Among many other things, he takes Ricks to task for mindlessly repeating the notion that the US went to war...
...on the basis of incorrect information – about weapons of mass destruction and a supposed nexus between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda's terrorism...

He points out that, in addition to any claims about WMD, Saddam was in violation of the Gulf War cease-fire agreements, a spate of UNSCR resolutions, and links to Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and other terrorist groups.
The decision to go to war does not rely on us being right about EVERYTHING the intelligence agencies suspected. The decision required only that an analysis of the risks and rewards of removing him from power warranted the invasion. The decision to go to war is justified not by us being right about everything, but on us being right enough on a few important things.
Tags: politics
Subscribe

  • I guess torture's OK by him after all.

    One of the canards that gets wide circulation is the claim that "torture doesn't work". The point of this canard is that torture is useless, and so…

  • "I Am Woman -- Protesting a Strong Woman"

    (Copied from my other blog) This came over the transom last night. After I degaussed my irony meter, I decided to share this with my loyal readers…

  • Hmmm.

    A post is up at the Usual Suspect defending Barack Obama's choice of pastor. My post: Interesting... A blogger styling himself "Instaputz"…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments